Drawing for Serial No. 78764831

USPTO serial 78764831

Serial No. 78764831

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78764831?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David E. Sipiora

David E. Sipiora Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Eighth FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Cluster computer system hardware comprising central processing units (CPUs), computers and servers; cluster computer system software for high performance computations; supercomputer systems comprising central processing units(CPUs), computers and servers; supercomputer systems central processing units (CPUs), computers and servers designed for use with open source computer operating systems; computer hardware and computer networks consisting of multiple computers; computer software, namely, operating system software for enhancing high performance and high availability computer hardware and computer networks; computer software for the setup, configuration and management of cluster computer systems and supercomputer systems, computer operating system software and multiple computers in a networked environmentACTIVE—
042Computer consultation; design of high performance and high availability computer systems, cluster computer systems,supercomputer systems, multiple computer systems and computer networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 29, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2007CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 1, 2007RPUBNOA CANCELLED; REPUBLICATION REQUIRED—
Jun 1, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance