Drawing for LENA

USPTO serial 78764942

LENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Brewster, Michael W. Rafter, Alicia G. Jones

William H. Brewster Kilpatrick Stockton LLP1100 Peachtree StreetSuite 2800Atlanta, GA 30309-4530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software for automatic analysis in the fields of human language development, human language assessment, and human language enrichmentACTIVE—
016printed educational materials in the fields of human language development, human language assessment, and human language enrichmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2006MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance