USPTO serial 78765179
HOT ROD HELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT ROD HELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All-purpose cleaners; Automobile cleaners; Automobile polish; Automobile polishes; Automobile wax; Automotive cleaning preparations; Carnauba wax for automotive use; Carpet cleaners; Carpet cleaners with deodorizer; Carpet cleaning preparations; Carpet shampoo; Chrome polish; Cleaning preparations for automobile; Detergents for automobiles; Fragrances for automobiles; Glass cleaners; Polymer sealant for cleaning, shining and protecting automobile exterior surfaces; Rust removing preparations; Stain removers; Tire dressings; Upholstery cleaners; Whitewall cleaners; Windshield cleaner fluids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jones, Greg
- Other trademarks owned by Jones, Greg
- Other trademarks owned by Guilmet, Jon, D.
- Other trademarks owned by Guilmet, Jon, D.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named HOT ROD HELL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |