Drawing for FLUSH BRUSH

USPTO serial 78766070

FLUSH BRUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLUSH BRUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. O'Rourke

THOMAS A OROURKE BODNER & O'ROURKE425 BROADHOLLOW RD STE 108MELVILLE, NY 11747-4701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cleaning implement in the nature of a toilet cleaning stick with disposable wipes and replacement wipes therefor for household use impregnated with chemicals or compounds, sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 16, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Oct 10, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 5, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 9, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jan 8, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance