Drawing for TDA

USPTO serial 78766548

TDA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TDA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

Julia Anne Matheson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 New York Avenue, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software related to financial information, investment, and trading, namely, electronic trading software, portfolio management software; financial analytical software, financial contact management software, financial risk modeling software; software for providing electronic connectivity to financial exchanges and markets.ACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, magazines, books, catalogs, newsletters, guides, manuals, pamphlets, and brochures, all in the fields of finance, investment, and trading.ACTIVE—
035Economic research and economic research services provided via a global computer network; economic forecasting and analysisACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, providing securities and investment information; commodity trading for others.ACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing conferences, webinars, webcasts, and seminars in the fields of investment and finances.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 18, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2006AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2006PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance