USPTO serial 78766788
HOME PATH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME PATH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.22nd FloorTwo Liberty Place, 50 South 16th StreetPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Pet topical lotions and creams, namely, tear-stain removers, ear cleaners; Pet skin and coat care products, namely, conditioners, colognes; pet dental products, namely, toothpastes, pet dental treats and oral health products, namely non-medicated teeth cleansers and breath fresheners | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pet topical lotions and creams, namely, dermatologic salves; pet dietary and nutritional supplements, namely, supplements in the form of treats and vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | pet grooming tools, namely, trimmers | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Pet collars and leads, namely, hemp or natural fiber dog and cat collars and leads | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Pet grooming tools, namely, brushes and combs; pet dental products, namely, toothbrushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Pet toy products, namely, hemp or natural fiber dog and cat toys, catnip toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Catnip | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pet Valu Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pet Valu Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named HOME PATH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |