Drawing for P'KOLINO

USPTO serial 78767399

P'KOLINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with P'KOLINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Leonardo

MARK S LEONARDO BROWN RUDNICK BERLACK ISRAELS LLP1 FINANCIAL CTR FL 18BOSTON, MA 02111-2688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Expensive, high end furniture products, namely tables, chairs, cabinets, storage boxes, beds, sofas and desksACTIVEFeb 1, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 1, 2007GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Aug 1, 2007GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 11, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 9, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance