USPTO serial 78767681
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1122 Romanel-sur-Morges, CH
1122 Romanel-sur-Morges, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P. Bhatti, Esq.
FARAH P. BHATTI MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVE., SUITE 500IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer peripherals, namely, keyboards, mice, trackballs and wireless electronic controllers all for use with consumer electronic equipment; computer control and input devices, namely, keyboards, mice, trackballs and wireless electronic controllers; game control devices, namely, remote controls, joysticks, interactive control floor pads, video game steering wheels, headsets, keyboards and mice all for use with computer and video game console platforms; video devices, namely, digital cameras and web cameras; audio and sound system devices, namely, speakers, headsets, headphones and microphones; telephony equipment, namely, headsets, headphones and microphones; digital writing systems for computers and mobile phones primarily composed of digital light pen and computer software; remote controls for controlling TVs, video players, video recorders, stereos, speakers and amplifiers; carrying cases for computer peripherals; computer software and computer programs for use in connection with providing an interface between a computer and a peripheral device; computer software and computer programs for manipulating and controlling images from web cameras and digital cameras; computer software and computer programs for producing sound; computer software and computer programs for handwriting and character recognition; computer software and computer programs for use in connection with electronic transmission of video, audio and data across local area, wide area and global computer networks; downloadable software for programming a remote control; computer operating software, computer programming software and instruction manuals sold as a unit with the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | Carrying cases for hand held computer gaming devices | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |