USPTO serial 78768673
HEADWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEADWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal (Quebec) H3A 2T5, CA
Montreal (Quebec) H3A 2T5, CA
Montreal (Quebec) H3A 2T5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marsha G. Gentner
MARSHA G GENTNER JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW FL 6WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on 44(e)) printed publications in the nature of journals, magazines, and newsletters on the topic of scientific research, discovery and innovation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing online publications in the nature of journals, magazines, and newsletters in the field of scientific research, discovery and innovation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McGill University
- Other trademarks owned by McGill University
- Other trademarks owned by McGill University
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named HEADWAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |