USPTO serial 78769150
METAGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METAGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. McGinley
BRIAN R MCGINLEY SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPP O BOX 061080, WACKER DR STATIONCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AIR FRESHENERS, FRAGRANCES AND SCENTED RETAIL PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |