Drawing for PREEN BY THORNTON BREGAZZI

USPTO serial 78769339

PREEN BY THORNTON BREGAZZI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREEN BY THORNTON BREGAZZI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Feldman

MARK I FELDMAN, CHRISTINA L MARTINI AN DLA PIPER US LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps, perfumes and cosmetic products, namely make-up and make-up removing preparations, after shave lotion, baby oil, blusher, cold cream, eye make-up, eye shadow, eyebrow pencil, eyeliner, lip gloss, lipstick, mascara, nail polish, rouge, skin moisturizer, vanishing cream, dentifrices, antiperspirants, body oil and aromatherapy oilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 13, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 13, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 11, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance