USPTO serial 78769936
INSPIRED BY EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSPIRED BY EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bingham B. Leverich, Esq.
Bingham B. Leverich, Esq. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded motion picture films, video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, DVDs, CD-ROMs, audio cassettes, audio tapes and computer software programs in the nature of interactive games, all in the fields of geography, cartography, natural history, science, the environment, nature, wildlife, history, social studies, archeology, ecology, exploration, adventure, active sports, children's entertainment, documentaries, education, genetics, anthropology, and cultural, educational and entertainment topics; pre-recorded video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, DVDs, CD-ROMs, audio cassettes and audio tapes featuring music and narration; sunglasses, eyeglasses, and frames thereof; eyewear cases; eyewear chains; magnets; decorative magnets; telephones; pagers; sporting helmets; bicycle helmets; binoculars and monoculars and cases thereof; night vision binoculars and monoculars; telescopes; sporting scopes, namely spotting scopes; microscopes; air tanks for use in scuba diving; scuba diving regulators; diving gloves; diving helmets; diving suits; altimeters; odometers; pedometers; thermometers; calculators; directional compasses; satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system (GPS); high vision optics, namely binoculars, monoculars, spotting scopes, telescopes; cameras; camera cases; camera filters; camera tripods; monopods for cameras or other handheld devices; bags for cameras and photographic equipment; personal computer carrying bags; computer mouse pads; magnetically encoded charge cards, debit cards, and pre-paid telephone calling cards; compact disc storage racks; compact disc holders; hand-held computers for language interpretation; educational computer software in the fields of undersea scientific research and exploration and marine environmental conservation; electronic voltage converters, electronic voltage adapters; weather kits comprised of altimeters, barometers and wind speed indicators; handheld electronic units that identify bird species and bird songs; bags for cellphones and cellphone accessories; automobile emergency kits comprising roadside assistance items, namely jumper cables, flashlight, aerosol tire inflator, emergency flares, hazard warning lights and manually operated hand tools, namely wrenches, pliers and screwdriver, and carrying cases therefor, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |