Drawing for BUSINESS E VIEW

USPTO serial 78770244

BUSINESS E VIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUSINESS E VIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Hughes

Michael F. Hughes Hughes Law Firm, PLLC5160 Industrial Place #107Ferndale, WA 98248UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Direct marketing services; providing a web site featuring product ratings of consumer goods and services in the fields of arts and entertainment, automotive, business and professional services, business-to-business, community and family, computers and electronics, construction and contractors, education, events and weddings, health and wellness, home and Garden, industry, agricultural and environment, legal and financial, media and communications, personal service and care, real estate, restaurants and food, retail, sports and recreation, transportation and travel; promoting the goods and services of others by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others; business marketing services, namely, providing online web site tools for businesses to advertise and market to existing and proposed customers, providing customer rating surveys, providing special incentives, namely, web site couponsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2009MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2009ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 27, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 6, 2008GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance