USPTO serial 78770611
SUNKEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3473810Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNKEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PINGZHEN CITY, TAOYUAN COUNTY 324, TW
Changhua Hsien, TW
Changhua Hsien, TW
Changhua Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley
Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John Street - Suite 403New York, NY 10038-3242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical additives used in the manufacture of infrared and ultraviolet absorbing preparations, namely, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KUO CHING CHEMICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNKEM FINE CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SUNKEM FINE CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SUNKEM FINE CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SUNKEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |