USPTO serial 78770730
GOODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
ROSENBERG KLEIN & LEE ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT PULP JUICES; FRUIT DRINKS; FRUIT JUICES; NECTAR; SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |