USPTO serial 78770946
TO BEE OR NOT TO BEE NATURAL PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2008
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TO BEE OR NOT TO BEE NATURAL PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | After sun creams, after-shave gel, after-shave lotions, after-sun lotions, almond soap, anti-bacterial soap, aromatherapy creams, aromatherapy lotions, aromatherapy oils, aromatherapy pillows comprising potpourri in fabric containers, baby hair conditioner, baby lotion, baby oils, baby powders, baby shampoo, bath beads, bath crystals, bath foams, bath gels, bathing lotions, bath milks, bath oils, bath powder, bath salts, bath soaps in liquid, solid or gel form, beauty creams for body care, beauty gels, beauty lotions, beauty masks, body and beauty care cosmetics, body creams, body cream soap, body lotions, body masks, body milks, body oils, cosmetic cleansing creams, cosmetic soaps, cream soaps, deodorant soap, deodorants for body care, essential oils for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products, face and body creams, face and body lotions, face creams, facial beauty masks, facial cleansers, facial scrubs, hair rinses in the nature of shampoo-conditioners, hair shampoo, hand creams, hand lotions, hand soaps, lip balm, non-medicated lip balm, lip cream, lip gloss, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, moisturizing milks, non-medicated bath preparations, non-medicated body soaks, non-medicated foot cream, non-medicated skin care preparations, non-medicated skin creams, oils for hair conditioning, perfume oils, perfumed creams, perfumed powders, perfumed soaps, perfumes, perfuming sachets, personal deodorants, potpourri, sachets, scented body spray, scented oils used to produce aromas when heated, scented room sprays, shampoos, shaving gels, shaving lotions, shaving soap, shower creams, shower gels, skin clarifiers, skin cleansers, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin conditioners, skin creams in liquid and solid form, skin lotions, skin masks, skin moisturizer, skin soap, soaps for body care, soaps for personal use, soaps for toilet purposes, toilet water, toothpastes, floating soap, bubble bath, non-medicated pet shampoo, aromatic gel for use in body care, non-medicated herbal bath soaks, non-medicated herbal foot soaks | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2007 |
| 004 | Beeswax for use in the manufacture of candles, beeswax for use in the manufacture of cosmetics, beeswax for use in the manufacture of ointments, candle torches, candles, candles for lighting, firewood, fragrant wax for use in potpourri burners, kindling, oils, waxes, fats and lipids for use in the manufacture of other products, patio torches, perfumed candles, scented candles, tallow, tallow candles, tapers, wood chips for smoking and grilling, wood chips for smoking and flavoring foods, wood chips for use as fuel, hand dipped bees wax taper candles, molded candles, carved candles | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MacKeen, Richard Paul
- Other trademarks owned by MacKeen, Richard Paul
- Other trademarks owned by MacKeen, Richard Paul
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named TO BEE OR NOT TO BEE NATURAL PRODUCTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |