USPTO serial 78771178
THE CHILDREN'S GENERAL STORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHILDREN'S GENERAL STORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil A. Burstein
Neil A. Burstein LAW OFFICES OF NEIL BURSTEIN370 LEXINGTON AVE RM 505NEW YORK, NY 10017-6593UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Playthings for children namely, rolling toys, namely, push toys and ride-on toys, plush toys, puzzle toys, namely, manipulative puzzles, play furniture, board games, toy building blocks, action figures, dolls, gift and novelty items, namely, party favors in the nature of small toys and Christmas tree decorations | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store and ordering services featuring toys, crafts, novelty items, providing consumer information about children's goods via a website | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pintchik, Laura
- Other trademarks owned by Pintchik, Laura
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE CHILDREN'S GENERAL STORE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |