USPTO serial 78771193
GORDITAS DONA JULIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3239150Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 2007
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GORDITAS DONA JULIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX
Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX
Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX
Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
Stewart L. Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLCSUITE 1002000 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; Restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Das Bierhaus De Mexico, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GORDITAS DONA JULIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 8, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |