USPTO serial 78771243
Serial No. 78771243
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78771243?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Potter Gleason
Ann Potter Gleason Summa PLLC501 West Trade St.Matthews, NC 28105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Containers for ice made of paper or cardboard | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 021 | Drinking glasses | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 025 | Blouses; Camp shirts; Cap visors; Dress shirts; Hats; Headgear, namely, HATS, CAPS; Jackets; Jerseys; Pants; Polo shirts; Shirts; Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Shorts; Sport coats; Sport shirts; Suit coats; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Tank tops; Tops; Windshirts | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 029 | Frozen fruits; Fruit pulps; Glazed fruits; Milk; Milk based beverages containing fruit juice; Milk beverages containing fruits; Milk beverages with high milk content; Milk drinks containing fruits; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 030 | Cones for ice cream; Flavored ices; Frozen yoghurt; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Ice; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cubes; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream cakes | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 032 | Drinking water; Flavored waters; Flavoured waters; Frozen fruit beverages; Frozen fruit-based beverages; Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit juice bases; Fruit juices; Fruit-flavored beverages; Fruit-flavored drinks; Fruit-flavoured beverages; Iced fruit beverages | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 035 | Retail consignment stores featuring ICE-CREAM AND FLAVOURED WATERS; Retail consignment stores in the field of ICE-CREAM AND FLAVOURED WATERS; Retail store services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; Retail variety stores | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
| 043 | Serving food and drinks; Serving of food and drink/beverages | ACTIVE | Apr 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRODUCTOS LÁCTEOS TOCUMBO, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |