USPTO serial 78771500
PAIN INTELLIGENCE CENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3769352Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 30, 2010
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAIN INTELLIGENCE CENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diana L. Hayes
101 E. Kennedy BoulevardSuite 2700Tampa, FL 33602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Healthcare management services, namely, processing data or statistics so as to develop protocols for the treatment of pain and diseases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 4, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Matrix Healthcare Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Matrix Healthcare Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Matrix Healthcare Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PAIN INTELLIGENCE CENTRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |