USPTO serial 78771630
BRILLIANCE IN SIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRILLIANCE IN SIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-64293 Darmstadt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
H JOHN CAMPAIGN JOHN M KEENE MILENA GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for industrial and scientific purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific and electronic apparatus and instruments; mobile electronics such as mobile phones, notebooks, pocket-size electronic devices; monitors, televisions, touch screens, multifunction screens; projection systems; high-frequency transponders; antennas; condensers; semiconductors; solid electronics; transistors; thin-film transistors; intelligent labels; illuminated displays based on organic semiconductors; displays for aviation and transport, instrument displays; navigation screens; electronic displays for household appliances; diagnostic instruments, not for medical purposes; electronic labels for goods; illuminated signals; illuminated signs; light-emitting diodes; photo elements; optical data storage systems; glass with electrically conductive coating, screen components | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Diagnostic instruments for medical purposes; doctors' instruments, light sources, markers, detectors and sensors for prophylaxis treatment, therapy and/or diagnosis in humans, animals and/or plants and/or for testing materials used for prophylaxis, treatment, therapy and/or diagnosis in humans, animals and/or plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Illumination devices; flat (fluorescent, phosphorescent, electrophosphorescent, electroluminiscent) light sources, light fittings or light sources for formed and/or structured signs, advertising signs, emergency and warning signs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter; printed publications; books; magazines; newsletters; brochures; booklets; pamphlets; manuals; journals; leaflets; greeting cards; advertising and promotional material; paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, not included in other classes; photographs; stationery; periodicals; catalogues; notebooks; writing pads; instructional and teaching materials (except apparatus); plastic materials for packing, not included in other classes; printed materials, namely, brochures, newsletters, memoranda and documentation in the filed of liquid crystals | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Products made of plastic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Merck KGaA
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named BRILLIANCE IN SIGHT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |