USPTO serial 78771757
AIRBOURNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2011
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with AIRBOURNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warrnambool Victoria, AU
Warrnambool Victoria, AU
Melbourne, AU
Melbourne, AU
Melbourne, AU
Melbourne, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter E. Nussbaum
Peter E. Nussbaum Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PCOne Boland DriveWest Orange, NJ 07052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound and/or video recordings featuring music; records featuring music; compact discs featuring music; DVDs featuring music; downloadable online sound and/or video recordings featuring music | ACTIVE | Jan 22, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Joel
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Joel
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Joel
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Ryan
- Other trademarks owned by O'Keeffe, Ryan
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AIRBOURNE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 11, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 11, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |