Drawing for SATIN SMOOTH

USPTO serial 78772258

SATIN SMOOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATIN SMOOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Galvanized metal chain link fencing; metal chain link fencing; metal fencing panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 19, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 6, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance