Drawing for KEY DIGITAL

USPTO serial 78772315

KEY DIGITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEY DIGITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Schwartz,

RICHARD LACAVA DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1177 AVE OF THE AMERICAS41ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009High definition accessory products for retail and home theater, namely analog video distribution amplifiers, analog video switchers, color space converters, digital video processors, TV tuners, digital video format converters, digital video cables, digital video switchers, digital video distruction amplifiers, and hard disk video storageACTIVEJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 4, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 4, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Sep 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance