USPTO serial 78772492
M MEMSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3666814Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 11, 2009
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with M MEMSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH AUSTRALIA, AU
Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
Hawthorn, Victoria, AU
Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
Hawthorn, Victoria, AU
Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
Hawthorn, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740Fairfax, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Winemaking equipment for altering the chemical makeup of wine, namely, centrifuges, centrifugal separators, calcining machines, separating machines, reverse osmosis pumps, machinery in the nature of vacuum distillation equipment, and machines used for process filtration in the winemaking industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Winemaking equipment, namely reverse osmosis filtration units, filtering units for removing settleable solids from wine, and distilling units; winemaking equipment, namely, membrane filter cartridges, metal cylindrical chambers and screens, all for use in filtering and removing settleable solids from wine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Winery services and provision of information and advice in relation thereto; winery services in the nature of manipulating wine composition,including the treatment of wine for alcohol adjustment, tannin manipulation, taint removal and volatile acidity reduction, and providing information, advice and consultancy in relation thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEMSTAR PTY LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Wine Network Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named M MEMSTAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 11, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |