Drawing for SAFEGUARD GO

USPTO serial 78772530

SAFEGUARD GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3309270Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 9, 2007
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFEGUARD GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

JULIA SPOOR GARD BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012child restraints for vehicle seats; booster car seatsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 7, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 15, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 3, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 29, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 29, 2007EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jan 23, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance