USPTO serial 78772698
EXTREME DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTREME DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell P. Brook, Esq.
MITCHELL P BROOK ESQ LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP11988 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2594UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | (USE IN COMMERCE) Nutritional and dietary supplements; nutritional and dietary supplements in the form of powered drink mixes; meal replacement drinks; powders, namely powder for making nutritional supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements; herbal supplements; (INTENT-TO-USE)-- Nutritionally fortified beverages; liquid concentrate for making beverages, namely, nutritionally fortified beverages | ACTIVE | Dec 8, 2005 |
| 032 | Liquid sports drinks; energy drinks; isotonic drinks; fruit-flavored drinks; liquid concentrate and powder for making beverages, namely, sports drinks, energy drinks, isotonic drinks and fruit-flavored drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Angel Sports Nutrition, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Angel Sports Nutrition, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named EXTREME DRIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |