USPTO serial 78772808
DECONSTRUCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECONSTRUCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
A.G. Professional Hair Care Products Ltd.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by A.G. Professional Hair Care Products Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel A. Scola Jr.
DANIEL A SCOLA JR HOFFMANN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791-4499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products, namely hairsprays and curl enhancers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |