USPTO serial 78773362
IP SMART BUSINESS SAVVY CLIENT CONNECTED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2007
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IP SMART BUSINESS SAVVY CLIENT CONNECTED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
Wilmington, DE
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
Wilmington, DE
Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor K. Sapphire
Victor K. Sapphire Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2300Los Angeles, CA 90071UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 19, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IP SMART BUSINESS SAVVY CLIENT CONNECTED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |