USPTO serial 78773593
BELSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3317377Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BELSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elliott J. Stein, Esq.
TILE & STONE SALES INC16 HERBERT STREETNEWARK, NJ 07105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Natural stone and agglomerate stone used in interior and exterior construction | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |