Drawing for FOUR SEASONS COURTYARD

USPTO serial 78774555

FOUR SEASONS COURTYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOUR SEASONS COURTYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

CHRISTOPHER J SCHULTE MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Portable propane heaters and kerosene heaters for home use; low voltage electric lighting fixtures and solar powered lighting fixturesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 8, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 24, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 14, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 14, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 7, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance