USPTO serial 78774832
OKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3561137Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 13, 2009
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
Funchal Madeira, PT
Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
Funchal Madeira, PT
Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
Funchal Madeira, PT
Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
Charles P. LaPolla Ostrolenk Faber LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk-based beverages with high milk content | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
- Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
- Other trademarks owned by NUTMARK-GESTAO DE DIREITOS DE PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL, LDA.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named OKEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 2, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |