USPTO serial 78775369
M2 MARCELMEDIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M2 MARCELMEDIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTEN S KNECHT
KRISTEN S KNECHT PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Internet marketing services; Internet advertising strategy services, and Internet advertising consulting services; and search engine marketing services, namely, advising others regarding search engine optimization strategies and sponsored link campaigns | ABANDONED | Mar 26, 2003 |
| 042 | Consulting others regarding Internet website management and maintenance; website design and development services; website hosting services; and website management services, namely, managing sponsored link campaigns and managing search engine optimization campaigns | ABANDONED | Mar 26, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |