USPTO serial 78775869
STRATEGIC LEARNING SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRATEGIC LEARNING SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advisory service for organizational issues and business administration, with and without the help of electronic data bases; Assistance with business management and planning; Assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, and business organization; Business acquisition and merger consultation; Business advice and analysis of markets; Business advice and commercial information; Business advice and information; Business advisory services, consultancy and information; Business consultation; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business consulting and information services; Business consulting, inquiries or information; Business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; Business information management; Business investigations; Business management consultancy as well as development of processes for the analysis and the implementation of strategy plans and management projects; Business research and surveys; Conducting business and market research surveys; Conducting business research and surveys; Information and data compiling and analyzing relating to business management; Information or enquiries on business and marketing; Information services relating to business matters; Information, advisory and consultancy services relating to business and management or business administration, including such services provided on line or via the internet; Market segmentation consultation; Marketing consulting; Providing business information, also via internet, the cable network or other forms of data transfer; Providing business marketing information; Providing statistical information | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |