Drawing for SKINFLURRY

USPTO serial 78775875

SKINFLURRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKINFLURRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William F. Lawrence, Esq.

William F. Lawrence, Esq. Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated skincare preparationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 15, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 28, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 17, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance