Drawing for ALEX RIDER

USPTO serial 78776476

ALEX RIDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALEX RIDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark H. Tidman

Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Dolls, doll clothing and doll accessories; puppets; quiz games; puzzles; amusement game machines; video game machines for use with televisions; games, toys and playthings and accessories thereto, namely, ride-on toys; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; toy vehicles; flying discs; infant action crib toys; inflatable toys; plastic character toys; play mats containing infant toys; toy pistols; toy scooters; toy watches; toy weapons; toy airplanes; toy animals and accessories therefore; toy model cars; bean bag dolls; dominoes; stuffed toys; bean bags; kites and accessories therefore; juggling equipment; magic tricks; playground equipment, namely, slides; playground equipment, namely, swings; yo-yos; board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing a board game; playing cards; trading card games; manipulative games; parlor games; action type target games; children's multiple activity toys; construction toys; dog toys; cat toys; electric actions toys; electric toy train transformers; electronic toy building blocks that light up as a night light; stand alone video output game machines; jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; paper face masks; skateboards; water squirting toys; bathtub toys; balls, namely, playground balls, soccer balls, baseballs, basketballs; baseball gloves; baseballs; basketballs; basketball goal sets; basketball goals; basketball nets; basketball table top games; batting gloves; boxing bags; boxing gloves; pinball-type games; inflatable swimming pools; in-line skates; football knee pads; table tennis tables; table tennis rackets; targets; tennis balls; tennis racket covers; volley balls; volley ball game playing equipment; swimming floats for recreational use; surfboards; swim boards for recreational use; swim fins; toy snow globes; Christmas tree ornaments; balloons; hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; handheld units for playing electronic games; promotional game materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 2009GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2009GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 12, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance