Drawing for MAESTROCREW

USPTO serial 78776516

MAESTROCREW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAESTROCREW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heidi L. Sachs

Heidi L. Sachs Perkins Coie LLP1201 Third AvenueSuite 4800Seattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software on CD-ROM and diskette for airline crew scheduling and managing flight operations; downloadable software for airline crew scheduling and managing flight operationsACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for airline crew scheduling and managing airline flight operationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 18, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 17, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 31, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance