USPTO serial 78776535
IROCKABLE TOGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IROCKABLE TOGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mona Chawla
MONA CHAWLA OPTIMUS LAW GROUP10 SOUTH LASALLE ST3500 CHASE PLAZACHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely shirts, jackets, sweaters, pants; recreational and sporting clothing, namely, sweatsuits, track suits, sweat jackets; shoes; headwear, namely hats, headbands, sweatbands, and bandanas | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of cassettes, tapes, videos, DVDs and compact discs featuring pre-recorded music; promoting the pre-recorded music of others; promoting the musical events and live musical performances of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, arrangement and composition of music for others; publication of musical text; production of musical entertainment events and live musical performances; electronic publishing services, namely publication of text and graphics of others on CD-ROM and DVD featuring art and music; music publishing services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |