USPTO serial 78776950
RED MAX DEFY THE DIRT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED MAX DEFY THE DIRT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dickson M. Lupo
Dickson M. Lupo Moore & Van Allen PLLC100 North Tryon Street, Suite 4700Charlotte, NC 28202-4003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL ADDITIVES FOR USE IN CLEANING, DEODORIZING AND REFRESHING INGREDIENTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLEANING PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | CLEANING PREPARATIONS FOR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES, DISHWASHER DETERGENT, FLOOR WAX, FLOOR FINISHING PREPARATIONS, FLOOR STRIPPING AND CLEANING PREPARATIONS, FURNITURE POLISH, GENERAL PURPOSE CLEANING, POLISHING AND ABRASIVE LIQUIDS AND POWDERS, GLASS CLEANERS, HOUSEHOLD CLEANING PREPARATIONS, STAIN REMOVERS, TOILET BOWL DETERGENTS, HEAVY-DUTY MULTI-PURPOSE DEGREASING PREPARATION FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, ALL-PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS, AND WATERLESS HAND CLEANING PREPARATIONS; DISPOSABLE WIPES IMPREGNATED WITH CHEMICALS OR COMPOUNDS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | HOUSEHOLD CLEANING TOOL, NAMELY, DISPOSABLE WIPES NOT IMPREGNATED WITH CHEMICALS OR COMPOUNDS; PLASTIC BAGS, NAMELY, TRASH BAGS, LAWN AND LEAF BAGS, AND GARBAGE BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | ABRASIVE PADS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR DOMESTIC USE, AND HOUSEHOLD CLEANING TOOLS, NAMELY, BROOMS, MOPS, BRUSHES, SPONGES, SCOURING PADS, SQUEEGEES, SCRUBBERS, AND CLEANING CLOTHS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LF, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LF, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named RED MAX DEFY THE DIRT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |