Drawing for EQUATRAX

USPTO serial 78777230

EQUATRAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUATRAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

LYNN M HUMPHREYS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in capturing high-volume sales transactions data, defining complex business rules and contract term variables, processing and reporting sales data against business rules to calculate royalty and related intellectual property rights, payments due to artists, writers, publishers, actors, and/or associated participants in the record music, music publishing, film/TV, video gaming, book publishing or other media and entertainment business segmentsACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software for use in capturing high-volume sales transactions data, defining complex business rules and contract term variables, processing and reporting sales data against business rules to calculate royalty and related intellectual property rights, payments due to artists, writers, publishers, actors, and/or associated participants in the record music, music publishing, film/TV, video gaming, book publishing or other media and entertainment business segmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 22, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance