USPTO serial 78777686
JOB SIGHT SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOB SIGHT SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sacramento, CA
Rancho Cordova, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Yung
John P. Yung Bullivant Houser Bailey PCSuite 10001415 L StreetSacramento, CA 95814Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Integrated wireless telephone and high speed data systems comprised of telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones, modems, radios, printed circuits, radio transmitters and receivers, transceivers, wireless adaptors, wireless bridges, telecommunications switches and antennas, and computer software in the field of mobile and fixed wireless communications for transmission of voice, data and video over radio frequencies; wireless video camera systems, namely, video cameras, wireless modems, computer processors, motion controllers, servo motors, and motion detection sensors, mounting devices in the nature of mounting supports, brackets and camera mounts, and lighting devices for taking pictures sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |