Drawing for JAROCHITO

USPTO serial 78778353

JAROCHITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OTT, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAROCHITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Albert B. Kimball, Jr.

ALBERT B KIMBALL JR BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2770UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks; Drinking water; Flavored waters; Fruit juice bases; Fruit juices; Mineral water; Soda water; Soft drinks; Soy-based beverages not being milk substitutesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 21, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 20, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance