USPTO serial 78778422
RAYITO DE SOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3679826Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAYITO DE SOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buenos Aires, AR
Buenos Aires, AR
Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Micol Cecchi
MICOL CECCHI ADAMS & REESE LLP424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219-2386UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and lotions, namely, perfume, cologne, toilet water, make-up, hair shampoo, skin lotion, sun tanning lotion and skin cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2008 | PCBD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - DENIED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |