Drawing for MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY

USPTO serial 78778481

MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HENRY, NAKIA D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. McGinley

BRIAN R MCGINLEY SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPP O BOX 061080, WACKER DR STATIONCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039transportation of goods for others by railACTIVEDec 31, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 22, 2007GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 30, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 30, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance