Drawing for THE PARK AT MOA

USPTO serial 78778979

THE PARK AT MOA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PARK AT MOA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Quinn

James P. Quinn LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN LTD7900 Xerxes Avenue South1500 Wells Fargo PlazaMinneapolis, MN 55431

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Decorative magnetsACTIVE—
016Paper shopping bags, and plastic shopping bagsACTIVE—
020Non-metal and non-leather key chains; non-metal money clipsACTIVE—
021Coffee mugs, drinking glasses, domestic use beverage glassware, and candy jarsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, jackets, sweaters, pants, belts, hats, visors, mock turtleneck shirts, and crew neck shirtsACTIVE—
041Providing and operating amusement parksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance