USPTO serial 78779144
MILTEX REDEFINING EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2008
- Examiner
- HELFMAN, JUDITH MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MILTEX REDEFINING EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
WILMINGTON, DE
YORK, PA
York, PA
York, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning preparations for use on dental, surgical, laboratory, diagnostic, and veterinary instruments, equipment, and apparatus | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Disinfectants and antiseptic care preparations for use on dental, surgical, laboratory, diagnostic, and veterinary instruments; lubricants for use on medical, dental, surgical, laboratory, diagnostic, and veterinary instruments; sanitary sterilizing preparations for use in medical procedures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Dental instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, dental handpieces, pliers, explorers, probes, aspirators, forceps, files, burs, diamond burs, gauges, dividers, scissors, strip holder clips, syringes, retractors, clamps, elevators, dental lights, excavators and mirrors, endodontic instruments, dental hand instruments, sterilization cassettes and organizers, dental hygiene instruments, periodontal instruments, and orthodontic instruments; surgical instruments and apparatus for use in general surgery, cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, dermatological surgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, micro surgery, oral surgery, neurosurgery, podiatric surgery, obstetrical and gynecological surgery, ophthalmic surgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, rectal surgery, genito-urinary surgery, and gastrointestinal surgery; diagnostic instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, percussion hammers, alloy tuning forks, neurological pin wheels, dynamometers, head mirrors, EKG calipers, binocular magnifying loupes and lenses and stethoscopes; veterinary instruments, equipment and apparatus, namely, forceps, syringes, scissors, chiropractic mallet, castrating apparatus, dental instruments, ear instruments, intestinal instruments, intramedullary fixation devices, nasal instruments, needle holders, neurosurgical instruments, ophthalmic instruments, orthopedic instruments, restraint instruments, retractors, spaying and teat instruments, specula, scalpel handles, scalpels, surgical blades, surgical needles, suture sundries, towel clamps and sponge forceps; and parts for all the aforementioned goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILTEX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MILTEX TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRA YORK PA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MILTEX, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MILTEX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MILTEX REDEFINING EXCELLENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |