USPTO serial 78779280
CHEMISTRY WITHOUT CHEMICALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3287907Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHEMISTRY WITHOUT CHEMICALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DELTA, BC, CA
Delta, British Columbia, CA
Delta, British Columbia, CA
Delta, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sofia Jeong
Sofia Jeong TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPSUITE 5200BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA, 600 PEACHTREE STRATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Plant food; fertilizers; enzyme regulating preparations for enhancing plant growth | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 25, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIPCO BIOENGINEERING INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sipco Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sipco Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sipco Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named CHEMISTRY WITHOUT CHEMICALS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |