Drawing for LEE STAFFORD PINK

USPTO serial 78779431

LEE STAFFORD PINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LEE STAFFORD PINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence P. Colton

Thomas R. Vigil THOMAS R. VIGIL LAW OFFICES319 BLUFF COURTLAKE BARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes and fragrances for personal use; eau de toilette; essential oils; non-medicated hair care preparations; hair colorants, dyes, tints and lotions; hair care preparations and lotions for protecting hair from heat; hair bleaching preparations; shampoos; hair conditioners; hair care preparations for the care and beauty of the hair; hair waving and hair setting preparations; hair mousse; hair care preparations in the nature of hair putty, hair gel, hair spray, hair wax, hair balm; toilet preparations, namely, non-medicated skin, scalp and body preparations; suntanning preparations; preparations for strengthening nails; non-medicated shower and bath preparations; soaps; body and bath oils; cosmetics; dentifrices; non-medicated preparations for the cleaning, care and beautification of the skin, scalp and hair; anti-perspirants; talcum powderABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 14, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 14, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 14, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 12, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 30, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance