USPTO serial 78779717
Serial No. 78779717
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78779717?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Syracuse, UT
Syracuse, UT
Syracuse, UT
Syracuse, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts, hats, hooded sweatshirts, pants, shorts, underwear, gloves, socks, scarves, sweaters, long sleeved shirts, tank tops, beanies, bandanas, boxers, briefs, thong underwear, panties, bras, sweat bands, skirts, dresses, blouses, jump suits, suits, infants' bodysuits, pajamas and slips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shumway, Eric Allen
- Other trademarks owned by Shumway, Eric Allen
- Other trademarks owned by Bourgoine, Jason Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by Bourgoine, Jason Thomas
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |