USPTO serial 78780128
SKYBLOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKYBLOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Audio broadcasting; Audio teleconferencing; Broadcasting programs via a global computer network; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to; Cellular telephone communication; Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication by mobile telephone; Communication by telegram; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Communication via analogue and digital computer terminals; Communication via computer terminals, by digital transmission or by satellite; Communication via radio, telegraph, telephone and television transmissions; Communications by computer terminals; Communications by means of mobile phones; Communications by television for meeting; Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recordings via the Internet; Communications via multinational telecommunication networks; Data communication by electronic mail; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Delivery of personalized greeting cards to others via electronic mail; Electronic data interchange; Electronic data transmission; Electronic exchange of data stored in databases accessible via telecommunication networks; Electronic mail services; Electronic message sending; Electronic message transmission; Electronic transmission of messages and data; Electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Information transmission via electronic communications networks; Instant messaging services; International telephone services; Internet cafe services, namely, providing telecommunications connections to the internet in a cafe environment; Internet telephony services; Interstate telephone services; Intrastate telephone services; Mobile radio communication; Mobile radio telephone services; Mobile telephone communication; Mobile telephony; News agencies, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations; Providing e-mail services; Providing private and secure real time electronic communication over a computer network; Providing voice communication services via the Internet; Provision of access to electronic sites; Streaming of audio material on the Internet; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Telecommunication services in the field of providing long distance service with audio advertising for others as a component of the long distance service; Telecommunications by e-mail; Telecommunications consultation; Transfer of data by telecommunication; Transfer of data by telecommunications; Transmission of database information via telecommunications networks; Transmission of information and images relating to pharmaceuticals, medicine and hygiene; Transmission of information by electronic communications networks; Transmission of information via national and international networks; Transmission of messages over electronic media; Transmission of news; Transmission of short messages; Transmission of sound and vision via satellite or interactive multimedia networks; Transmission of sound, picture and data signals; Transmission of sound, video and information; Transmission of stock market information with the help of telecommunication media; Web messaging | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |